Four hundred and you can eighty-three professionals was indeed employed regarding a massive college in the Hong-kong through advertising posted for the university and you will places, size emails as a consequence of divisions and you may qualities, and you may snowballing. Testing took place within the a laboratory. Users completed the latest gender salience scale, the new combined-sex anxiety size and you will advertised its group record. All steps was in fact demonstrated inside their unique English vocabulary since English is the medium away from tuition to possess tertiary training for the Hong kong. This research are done in accordance toward suggestions and you can approval of your own University of Hong-kong Peoples Look Integrity Committee (HKU HREC). Most of the victims provided composed advised agree according to the Statement of Helsinki. Adult concur was not necessary for the latest HKU HREC for this decide to try.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to Age Gap dating detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Dining table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
b step 1 = no education/pre-top, 2 = first, 3 = junior secondary, 4 = older additional, 5 = post-supplementary, six = postgraduate.
c 0 = most other gender just, 1 = most other gender mainly, 2 = almost every other intercourse somewhat more, step three = each other gender similarly, 4 = same sex somewhat more, 5 = same gender mainly, six = same intercourse merely.
d Details inside desk were incorporated since covariates in all analyses, with the exception of general social anxiety that has been incorporated since the a beneficial covariate simply during the analyses of mixed-sex stress with the college or university attempt.
Gender salience scale
Intercourse salience is actually counted by the exact same strategy included in Studies 1. The newest inter-rater reliability are good for the responses (? ranging from .87 so you can .99).
Part of most other-gender best friends size
Portion of almost every other-intercourse close friends is actually mentioned by same method utilized in Analysis step 1. Part of almost every other-intercourse relatives wasn’t assessed on school sample.
Mixed-gender stress size
Like in Studies step one, members stated the combined-sex nervousness into the altered relationship nervousness scale (DAS-A) . In contrast to Investigation 1, participants when you look at the Study dos accomplished an entire 21-items brand of DAS-An in this dating feel was well-known about college or university take to (93.4% of your users stated a world matchmaking sense; see directory of relationships sense issues regarding the Relationships History Questionnaire for the Desk D for the S1 Document). Individuals who had never ever dated in advance of was in fact expected to visualize exactly how they might end up being and you may function throughout the described items. For it full-scale, ten things mentioned Concern with Negative Assessment, 7 products measured Societal Stress in Matchmaking Items, four activities mentioned Public Stress for the Blended-gender Groups, and five filler circumstances provided a break off rating nervousness-relevant items. The interior feel try best for total DAS-An excellent (? = .95), Anxiety about Negative Evaluation (? = .92), Societal Stress within the Relationship (? = .89), and Social Stress for the Mixed-intercourse Communities (? = .80). Due to the fact the appeal was not only for the dating nervousness and only 2.6% of university participants said that have zero heterosexual appeal anyway, we incorporated all the members from the research of combined-sex stress and you will controlled to have intimate direction.